为什么这么多的人在美国监狱?

为什么这么多的人在美国监狱?

近年来,一个 越来越多的共识两党 各地监狱改革已初具规模,团结在国会的决策者谁通常是对法律和秩序问题两侧。 与此同时, 全国宣传活动 关于刑事司法系统治疗年轻黑人带来了紧迫性问题,而来自社交媒体和新闻媒体的焦点相对应的新的水平 - 而如新的报告举措外观 马歇尔计划 - 已帮助推动了政策讨论。

Reporters writing about incarceration rates and the complexities of the sentencing laws and prison systems are frequently confronted with a slew of facts and figures, some of which can seem contradictory and fraught with political controversy. It therefore can be difficult to discern the most important and authoritative findings that speak to the current moment in the United States.

A landmark 2014 report, “The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences,” from the National Research Council of the National Academies — the preeminent research body in the United States, part of the National Academy of Sciences and chartered by Congress — was authored by a committee of leading criminal justice scholars from across the country. The project’s chair and vice chair were Jeremy Travis of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice at City University of New York and Bruce Western of the Department of Sociology and Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

The report’s findings and insights can credibly and authoritatively anchor coverage and debate about this issue. The following are key statements within the 464-page document.

Empirical Findings:

  • “The U.S. penal population of 2.2 million adults is the largest in the world. In 2012, close to 25% of the world’s prisoners were held in American prisons, although the United States accounts for about 5% of the world’s population. The U.S. rate of incarceration, with nearly 1 of every 100 adults in prison or jail, is 5 to 10 times higher than rates in Western Europe and other democracies.”
  • “During the 1980s, the U.S. Congress and most state legislatures enacted laws mandating lengthy prison sentences — often of 5, 10, and 20 years or longer — for drug offenses, violent offenses, and ‘career criminals.’ In the 1990s, Congress and more than one-half of the states enacted ‘three strikes and you’re out’ laws that mandated minimum sentences of 25 years or longer for affected offenders. A majority of states enacted ‘truth-in-sentencing’ laws requiring affected offenders to serve at least 85% of their nominal prison sentences.”
  • “From 1980 to 2000, the number of children with incarcerated fathers increased from about 350,000 to 2.1 million — about 3% of all U.S. children. From 1991 to 2007, the number of children with a father or mother in prison increased 77% and 131%, respectively.”
  • “Among white male high school dropouts born in the late 1970s, about one-third are estimated to have served time in prison by their mid-30s. Yet incarceration rates have reached even higher levels among young black men with little schooling: among black male high school dropouts, about two-thirds have a prison record by that same age — more than twice the rate for their white counterparts. The pervasiveness of imprisonment among men with very little schooling is historically unprecedented, emerging only in the past two decades.”

incarceration

Conclusions Based On The Scientific Evidence:

  • “The growth in incarceration rates in the United States over the past 40 years is historically unprecedented and internationally unique.”
  • “The unprecedented rise in incarceration rates can be attributed to an increasingly punitive political climate surrounding criminal justice policy formed in a period of rising crime and rapid social change. This provided the context for a series of policy choices — across all branches and levels of government — that significantly increased sentence lengths, required prison time for minor offenses, and intensified punishment for drug crimes.”
  • “The incremental deterrent effect of increases in lengthy prison sentences is modest at best. Because recidivism rates decline markedly with age, lengthy prison sentences, unless they specifically target very high-rate or extremely dangerous offenders, are an inefficient approach to preventing crime by incapacitation.”
  • “People who live in poor and minority communities have always had substantially higher rates of incarceration than other groups. As a consequence, the effects of harsh penal policies in the past 40 years have fallen most heavily on blacks and Hispanics, especially the poorest.”

The report’s authors provide many recommendations, chief among them: “Given the small crime prevention effects of long prison sentences and the possibly high financial, social, and human costs of incarceration, federal and state policy makers should revise current criminal justice policies to significantly reduce the rate of incarceration in the United States. In particular, they should reexamine policies regarding mandatory prison sentences and long sentences. Policy makers should also take steps to improve the experience of incarcerated men and women and reduce unnecessary harm to their families and their communities.”

YOUTUBE}https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-kFNDlzL9k{/ YouTube上}

这篇文章最初出现在 记者的资源

相关书籍:

锁定,锁定:为什么监狱不工作,如何我们可以做得更好

作者: 玛雅Schenwar
绑定: 平装
出版商: berrett-克勒出版社
价格表: $18.95
优惠 - 购买新的来源: $10.87 使用从: $8.14
现在购买


An Expensive Way to Make Bad People Worse: An Essay on Prison Reform from an Insider's Perspective (Flashpoint)

作者: Jens Soering
绑定: 平装
特点:
  • 旧书状况良好

出版商: 元宵书籍
价格表: $12.00
优惠 - 购买新的来源: $6.90 使用从: $0.63
现在购买